Well, maybe I could have resisted, but this is something that has been a big part of the past 2 years of my life, and it has been such an important developement I believe, stirred by the Spirit of God in me. So I am going to do something I had thought I would wait until I was done with the book to do.
I am presently reading the soon to be released book from Brian McLaren Everything Must Change....Jesus, Global Crises, and a Revolution of Hope. I am almost half way through at this point, and in my reading today I ran across what has been for me the greatest point he has made so far. There have been others though.
It comes from a section he calls: HEARING JESUS WITH FIRST-CENTURY EARS. The phrase comes from NT Wright, who has done much work studying Jesus in his historical setting.
I am going to refrain from putting up anymore large sections of this book so as to leave it to those who are interested in reading it themselves so that you can have your own discoveries. Like I said, this one I couldn't resist putting out there as a taste. I believe this to be a much needed perspective change. It has been instrumental this past year producing in me an entire deconstruction and re-working of my world view.
"The phrase "kingdom of God" on Jesus' lips, then, means almost the opposite of what an American like me might assume, living in the richest, most powerful nation on earth. To the citizen of Western civilization like me, kingdom language suggest order, stability, government, policy, domination, control, maybe even vengeance on the rebels and threats of banishment for the uncooperative. But on Jesus' lips, those words describe Caesar's kingdom: God's kingdom turns all of those associations upside down. Order becomes opportunity, stability melts into movement and change, status-quo government gives way to revolution of community and neighborliness, policy bows to love, domination descends to service and sacrifice, control morphs into influence and inspiration, vengeance and threats are transformed into forgiveness and blessing.
In his message of the kingdom of God, then, Jesus proposes a radical new framing story, and he wanted people to trust him enough to give his way to peace a chance. How does he do so? In public, he teaches people (often using parables, which invite them to think rather than telling them what to think) and heals them (which is often described as freeing or liberating them from disease and demons)---rather than propagandizing them (telling them what to think while simultaneously keeping them from thinking for themselves) controlling them (oppressing them under sick and demonic systems of oppression). In private, he eats meals with people---all the wrong sorts of people---to demonstrate that the kingdom of God transforms by grace and acceptance rather than by fear or threats of exclusion. In the midst of Rome's empire, wherever Jesus goes, he creates a family meal where all are welcome.
Some will be quick to note that Jesus also used strong language of exclusion---being thrust into "outer darkness," for example where there is "weeping and gnashing of teeth." But in an irony that is so powerful it can hardly be overstated, Jesus applies that language to the typically exclusive (religious scholars, Pharisees,etc.), and asserts that the typically excluded (prostitutes, sinners, even Gentiles) will be included before them (Matthew 23:13, Luke 13:28-30, Luke 4:24-27) Clearly Jesus is deconstructing the dominant system of exclusion---not fortifying it.
No wonder Jesus mixes metaphors so freely: kingdom can be useful in confronting the kingdom of Herod and the empire of Caesar, but it also needs to be deconstructed and augmented by other more intimate and less violent metaphors. So Jesus habitually refers to God as Father rather than King. As the famous prodigal son parable profoundly communicates, the rebel and the upright are equally God's children, as (we could extrapolate) are the Jew and the Gentile, the free and the slave, the religious scholar and the prostitute, the female and the male. The Father's deep desire is to bring all the children home into his feast (Luke 15:11-32)."
This is some of what Father has been doing in my life this past year. Deconstructing how the dominant framing script of American Christianity had shaped me to see things. I just couldn't defend it any longer. I so clearly remember feeling that he was speaking to me this simple but stern statement. Kent, you speak of a life you say you believe in, but you go one living like you don't believe it. My life began to come undone at that point because I knew this was true. I also remember my response at that time. Okay, show me. The showing began and still continues today. I have said so many times as something new is revealed to me; I don't think I can do this? He has been so gentle in his response; I know. But I can take you there. He has been so faithful to that promise.
So I move on in this new journey one day at a time. I think that is how he encouraged us to proceed?
I will put up a full review once I finish reading the book.
19 comments:
solid!!! oh Lord, free us from white man's religion! empower us to flow in the harmony way.
Perhaps Jesus meant all the things McLaren suggests, perhaps not... but if He did, why would He choose to use the word "kingdom"?
confusing....I don't totally understand your question Alan.
But I will take a shot at it any way. He used the word kingdom because he was presenting his Father's kingdom?
I think all McLaren is saying here is to be careful if the kingdom you find yourself defending looks like the world around you. The kingdom Jesus spoke of looks and operates in a different way.
Let me qualify what I'm asking: I don't for a minute believe that Jesus's kingdom is about vengeance, domination or threats. But He called Himself a king, and said He had a kingdom, and those terms meant something to his listeners. In Luke 22 He makes it clear that there is at least 1 major difference between a worldly kingdom and His own, but if He had not intended any comparison to a kingdom, then why would He have used that word?
I heartily agree with your last statement Kent. If we as Christians, and we as a Church, don't look any different than the world around us, then we have reason to question if we are His at all.
I think that McLaren might be tossing out the baby with the bath water though.
McLaren is talking about the kingdom of heaven and has not even come close to tossing out the use of the word kingdom. He uses it all the time. He is drawing a distinction between the two.
Let me ask you a question? Do you see the big movement with at least the vocal Christians in this nation, being about a kingdom that resembles Jesus, the sermon on the mount and Jesus' other references to his kingdom? Or one that at least looks and sounds like a blending of an agressive, greedy, dominating, forceful kingdom with some of what Jesus said?
Kent,
Interesting stuff here. Just a quick thought/question?
Does it make God/Christ less of a king in our knowing Him as our Father, and now being part of His family as our Father vs a King?
We all use to be part of another family, and by his grace we have been brought into a living, loving family, and yes He is a King, but doesn't he address us as sons, meaning Him wanting us to relate to him as a Father?
I hope this makes some kind of sense :)
Rich
it makes perfect sense to me Rich....and I agree
Alan, I have another question for you. Let's just be honest and get to WHY you keep popping into my life randomly with all this concern. Are you worried about me? Do you think I am in danger of going to hell? If this is the case, just say it and be done with it. Your arguments just don't resonate with me. They just go on and on and on and I have heard them all before. Not just from you but your are just echoing the truth police arguments that have been made for centuries. That's me being totally honest with you.
I'm not worried about your relationship with Father......he is capable of keeping you and guiding you....I trust him with that.
Can you simply trust me into his hands? If not? Why not?
Great responses and questions, Kent and Rich... I'll chew on what you've said and respond when I've got a minute.
Just so everyone who stops by here knows. Alan (inhisgrip) and I have known each other for a long time. Acually good friends that don't see each other anymore. This is a conversation I wish we were having in private and face to face. But he seems to want to do it this way? Hence the reference to him popping up every so often with his questions and arguments.
That is why I asked him the questions in the last comment I made. Just so I know where he is coming from.
So what makes you so special you get to read it before the rest of us mere plebians? ;)
funny thing is Sue in this advance release (I'm certain there have been others with this book) they gave out 50 books to the first 50 to respond to an email they sent out. Rob,Joy and myself all got copies. 3 friends got books out of the 50 given away. Heather from Thomas Nelson Publishing told me the other day that the requests for these 50 books were overwhelming, which makes it even more amazing to me that the three of us got tagged for it (Rob's words).
i was pretty quick to respond - but i think kent was even quicker! i am hoping my mailbox will not taking a beating today! :)
I see nothing innapropriate or objectionable in my questions. Your response, however, tells me that a face-to-face conversation might be counter productive.
Alan
Rich, quick thought on your question re: God being Father vs. God being King. He absolutely is both.
In one sense He is the Father of all mankind (Ac 17.29), and all people are His children. In another sense He is a Father only to those who believe (Jn 1.12). It is this second group that have eternal life through Jesus.
He is also a King to those who believe. While Jesus repudiated all attempts to make him King of an earthly kingdom (Mt 4), He does acknowledge the title of King (Jn 18.37). The apostles also acknowledge His place as King (1 Tim 1.17 etc). Believers are subject to His rule and authority. He has equipped some within that kingdom with authority over others - and He will hold them accountable for the task of watching over their souls(Ac 20.28, Hb 13.17).
Webster's defines kingdom as "the realm in which God's will is fulfilled." As Mt 7 points out, only those who understand and obey His recorded words will be admitted into the kingdom of heaven.
I understand McLaren is making the point that some of what considers itself part of God's kingdom is, in reality, a distortion of what Jesus taught. I agree... I've seen some of that myself. In our efforts to counteract legalism and worldiness in the Church, however, let's not forget, that Jesus's version of "kingdom" does not exclude such things as order, stability, and authority. That He actually told people how AND what to think, that He condemned sin, that He is the judge of all mankind - admitting some to eternal life and others to eternal destruction, and that hell is not reserved only for those practicing "exclusivity."
Alan, first off the question wasn't about whether your questions are appropriate (read my question again and you will see that) it was about the motivation behind them.
Also, you make the assumption that a more personal face to face conversation would be counter productive.....I would ask you another question in light of that assumption....Do you think your approach from a few months ago, in disguise under an anonomous screen name, and up to this day with your random drive by questioning has been productive or counter productive to you and I, as two brothers walking in the light with each other?
Are you interested in working through this or are you not? It's not going to happen on this blog or any forum. If your not interested in working through this, your approach then just seem to be out of concern for my soul or to pester me? I'm not pestered nor am I moved if it is out of concern for my soul.
I'm not interested in playing along with you if it is either of the latter two. If it is as brother who desires to work it out call me some time and we can do breakfast.
Kent, I read your blog from time to time. Sometimes I agree with what I see, other times disagree. Occasionally, I take a minute to voice that.
As for working through something... I'm not looking to fix anything, nor am I sure that there's anything to fix.
I can accept that Alan.
Post a Comment